Interview success percentages at UK medical schools

Banner image: success; photo by Zac Durant on Unsplash

Our bar chart and data table show percentages of applicants interviewed who finally secure places at UK medical schools

Curious about percentages of applicants who succeed at interviews and take up places at UK medical schools?

Our interactive chart and data table can help you review this, focusing on your target UK medical schools.

Important notes

This data is retrospective, so future numbers are subject to change from those reported here.

Competition data reported is from the 2019-20 admissions cycle, as confirmed by MedSchoolGenie Freedom of Information (FOI) requests from this period. For more details, see our notes below on data scope.

You can  adjust this interactive chart and data table

By default, the chart and table below display information about all UK medical schools, sorted by Home applicant percentages of success. To focus only on medical schools of interest, you can filter by medical school names. To revert after applying any filter, and see all (unfiltered) results, use the 'Reset' button.

Displaying 1 - 39 of 39 UK medical schools

Medical school Percentage of Home applicant interviews resulting in a placesort descending Percentage of International applicant interviews resulting in a place
Buckingham
Data not available re Home interview success rates Data not available re International interview success rates
Cambridge
Data not available re Home interview success rates Data not available re International interview success rates
UCLan
6.1% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 23.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Edge Hill
8.9% of Home applicants interviewed secure places Data not available re International interview success rates
Liverpool
16.3% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 15.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Anglia Ruskin
16.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places Data not available re International interview success rates
Plymouth
17.1% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 7.1% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Aberdeen
17.5% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 12.6% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Norwich (UEA)
18.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 21.1% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Nottingham
20.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 20.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Cardiff
21.1% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 23.7% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Leeds
21.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 16.7% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Keele
22.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 25.9% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Leicester
23.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 17.4% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Manchester
23.9% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 10.6% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Bristol
24.3% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 10.1% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Southampton
25.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 15.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Sheffield
25.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 16.9% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Dundee
26.2% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 10.8% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Birmingham
26.5% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 24.9% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Exeter
26.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 31.6% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Aston
27.4% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 24.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
St Andrews
28.2% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 31.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Hull York
28.6% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 18.8% of International applicants interviewed secure places
St George's London
28.6% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 23.1% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Brighton and Sussex
28.6% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 13.6% of International applicants interviewed secure places
UCL
30.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 35.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Queen’s Belfast
31.1% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 33.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Kent and Medway
33.8% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 75.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Newcastle
33.9% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 31.4% of International applicants interviewed secure places
King's College
35.9% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 30.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Edinburgh
36.7% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 34.7% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Lincoln
37.5% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 21.4% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Oxford
39.8% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 43.9% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Imperial
40.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 80.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Barts
40.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 20.0% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Glasgow
46.8% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 36.7% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Lancaster
58.5% of Home applicants interviewed secure places 20.3% of International applicants interviewed secure places
Sunderland
75.0% of Home applicants interviewed secure places Data not available re International interview success rates

Notes on data scope

With interview management devolved across its various colleges, Cambridge has not reported consolidated data on interviews.

As a private medical school (not subject to FOI regulations), Buckingham has not responded to requests for information on competition ratios.

As explained in our notes on 'Home' classifications, UK medical schools counted EU applicants within the 'Home' category in the 2019-20 and previous admissions cycles.  When making comparisons with later data sets, keep in mind that UK medical schools after Brexit start counting EU applicants within 'International' category.

Due to ongoing impact of Covid-19 since March 2020, UK medical schools have not yet released competition ratio data for this period. Applicants should keep in mind that coronavirus-related lockdowns and other restrictions affected the entire UK education sector, so competition ratios were most likely distorted during and following the 2020-21 admissions cycle. MedSchoolGenie will update here when further competition data becomes available. 

If you have questions about calculations and data sources used here and in other overviews of competition, see our FAQs on 'Home' and 'International' competition.

For alternative ways of understanding competition data, see also our resources on competition numbers, ratios and percentages.

You can login to bookmark this post and access power-user options